Amsterdam is an Italian holding under Dutch law is formelly Istituto Finanziario Industriale. IFI investment company derives its main income from the automotive industry. The capital stock of Amsterdam is mainly owned and administered by the founder heirs. In 2024, the board of directors was 10 people.

When an investment fund is evaluated to take advantage of its remunerative performance, it is very about a future that has not yet occurred. In the stock exchange, as a matter of principle, any factor that reduces the field of statistical uncertainties sharpens speculation. As the free float represents a 1/3 of the units, this makes the administration of Amsterdam permeable to the doubt, to the questioning in front of the unknown, so that it is possible to it to act to minimize a known risk and to justify the confidence that carries it the investor.

However, the empire of Amsterdam was first built on the qualities of the de cusus¹ before opening itself to the collegiality of shareholding. Then, the question arises whether, by attempting to take advantage of an inherited patrimony, the shareholder does not itself wither away the talent that motivated his/her investment. But the success of Amsterdam means thinking that one succeeds the good and not the person. So, when shareholders questions the legitimacy of an heir company settle rather than creating a paradigm, in reality they questions the performance of their securities. The 2020 crisis will bring a new prospective about Amsterdam’s stock market performance. Enlightened by the outbreak, it is necessary to apprehend the colors that stand out from the portrait of Amsterdam. Never tested in the same way until now, they reveal the roughness to which shareholders can retake themselves.

First of all, we have shown that Amsterdam has a set of companies that are considered essential resources in case of epidemics, namely: the production of agricultural tractors with New Hollande, transport and military trucks with Iveco and firefighting trucks in Ulm. This is an indiscontinuous revenue base for the rights holders of Burr Ridge, even in the event of a national request.

Secondly, we established the incentive of Maranello’s production with regard to its developed turnover/ employee volume ratio but also thanks to the positive rating of used vehicles. This is the very center of the economic stability of Amsterdam, whose limits have nevertheless been set; we think of an autonomous policy which, while including the theme of performance, addresses more globally the place of innovation in contemporary shareholding, like the valuation of Palo Alto.

Finally, the examination of the legal and administrative precedents of the Amsterdam companies does not find any act detrimental to their growth. One of them even goes so far as to anticipate possible international disputes, denouncing any contentious situation with third parties. Although this is neither its main interest nor the objective pursued by its CLO, Ferrari offers a relevant overview to the OECD and itself with a wealth of reflections on the fight against secret funding in different international contexts.

Amsterdam provides an opportunity to familiarise oneself with the approaches to the stock market and to become familiar with their contexts of emergence as well as the epistemological or ethical issues they raise, in particular with the strategy of Nizza-Monferrato. Its interest is however elsewhere, and resides in the fact of intervening in the future and the world in the process of being redone, and this through a large number of contributions, covering extremely varied topics and audiences. Thus, these shares are unquestionably original and valuable in the investment landscape for small holders.

For this reason,

Amsterdam deserve a middle high confidence.